Activist Job Amupanda has staunchly defended his challenge to the Veterinary Cordon Fence (Red Line) during cross-examination in the High Court.

Professor Amupanda argued that the Red Line perpetuates systemic discrimination against approximately 60% of Namibians while benefitting what he called a few "capitalists," calling for its removal to uphold constitutional rights and equality. 

Advocate Raymond Heathcote, representing the respondents, questioned Amupanda about the economic risks of removing the Red Line, suggesting that such an action could lead to the loss of 600,000 jobs. Amupanda dismissed this claim, stressing that credible research and studies contradict the argument and highlight the discriminatory nature of the barrier. 

Amupanda stated that the Red Line, a remnant of colonial-era policies, unfairly restricts movement and economic opportunities for communities living north of it. He reminded Heathcote that he came to court to seek protection of his rights and those of millions of Namibians. 

The case, which examines both the constitutionality and socio-economic impacts of the Red Line, continues amidst intense debate.